The age of the convoluted blockbuster →

It’s almost too easy to link to another Film Crit Hulk piece given his consistency. But this is another 10000 words easily worth your time if you’re interested in film, especially screenplays for big budget films over the summer (or have always had a bit of skepticism over J.J. Abrams’ skill overseeing screenplays.)

Here’s my favorite part:

LET’S GET HYPOTHETICAL: IF YOU (THE REAL YOU READING THIS NOW) WERE WALKING DOWN THE STREET AND SOMEONE CAME UP TO YOU AND YELLED, “Quick! I’m your long-lost brother you never knew you had! Someone’s after me! We have to run!!!!” YOU WOULD BE COMPLETELY TAKEN OFF-GUARD, WOULDN’T YOU? NOW, WOULD YOU BE CURIOUS? WOULD IT BE CRAZY? WOULD IT BE EXCITING? SURE! BUT YOU WOULDN’T EXACTLY BE INVESTED. YOU WOULD BE SUSPICIOUS. YOU WOULD DISTANCE YOURSELF. MEANWHILE, IF YOUR ACTUAL BROTHER THAT YOU’VE KNOWN AND LOVED YOUR WHOLE LIFE SHOWED UP AND SAID “Quick! Someone’s after me! We have to run!” YOU WOULD BE MUCH MORE INVESTED! IT’S YOUR BROTHER, AFTER ALL. BOTH ARE YOUR “BROTHERS” BUT ONE IS A PERSON WITH WHOM YOU HAVE A SHARED HISTORY AND LOVE. YOU HAVE ALL THE RELEVANT INFORMATION TO YOUR BOND THUS THERE WOULD BE A SUBSTANTIAL ROOTING INTEREST. AND BETWEEN THESE TWO SCENARIOS, THE MORE DRAMATIC AND COMPELLING SITUATION SHOULD BE OBVIOUS, RIGHT?

Feeding our reading habits →

Technologist Alex Kessinger on using feed readers effectively:

Reading efficiently can mean a number of things to people, and that’s fine. Some people want to read to stay up to date, others want to cover a lot of ground while not spending too much time reading. The idea is that reading efficiently covers the whole spectrum of reading goals.

Efficiency is a formula. How much did you consume, in what amount of time, and what do you have to show for it? If you read a ton quickly, but you can’t recall what you read, then you are wasting your time. If you want to have a high recall, and thus consume a small amount of material slowly, that’s fine, but this is a balancing act. You need to decide what your goal is before you can do anything to optimize for it.

Well said. This long series of posts inspired me to shake up my RSS feed reading habits. It might be a good topic for an upcoming blog post here.

Responsive navigation plugin →

I’ve written enough responsive navigations in the last few months to be skeptical when I see a simple Javascript-based plugin solution. But probing further, the developer is Viljami Salminen, and the guy’s talented. It’s also library agnostic – no awkward jQuery dependency required. Worth taking a look at for your next responsive project.

Are the PS4 and Xbox One really that expensive, historically? →

The short answer by Ars Technica is “no”. Frankly I don’t know what’s more interesting, the notion that PS4 and XBox One are a relative bargain, or that a new Neo Geo would cost $1111 in today’s dollars.

The Xbox One: hardware analysis & comparison to PlayStation 4 →

It’s an older article but is worth revisiting now that the dust over Microsoft’s DRM stance has somewhat settled. AnandTech’s Anand Lai Shimpi goes into some expected serious depth here:

Differences in the memory subsytems also gives us some insight into each approach to the next-gen consoles. Microsoft opted for embedded SRAM + DDR3, while Sony went for a very fast GDDR5 memory interface. Sony’s approach (especially when combined with a beefier GPU) is exactly what you’d build if you wanted to give game developers the fastest hardware. Microsoft’s approach on the other hand looks a little more broad…It’s a risky strategy for sure, especially given the similarities in the underlying architectures between the Xbox One and PS4. If the market for high-end game consoles has already hit its peak, then Microsoft’s approach is likely the right one from a business standpoint. If the market for dedicated high-end game consoles hasn’t peaked however, Microsoft will have to rely even more on the Kinect experience, TV integration and its exclusive franchises to compete.

Our web development workflow is completely broken →

Web developer and speaker Kenneth Auchenberg makes a strong argument about how our web tool integration has a long way to go from where we are today. If you’re pressed for time, just skip right to his first flow chart, it’s sobering to read. Makes you step back and realize at times how ridiculous the disconnect is between our browser and code editor of choice.

Introducing the HTML5 FullScreen API →

Really smart intro by web developer Dudley Storey on the tech basics on how to properly integrate HTML5 full screen functionality. It’s something I’ve toyed with once or twice on some little side projects but never had the chance to go in further depth.

Welcome to Cloud.typography →

Seeing Hoefler and Frere-Jones jump into the web font game with their own custom delivery solution is super exciting. Can’t wait to see web sites jump on board this; I’d bet money the quality will be uniformly excellent.

Mad Men finale recap: the only unpardonable sin →

Matt Zoller Seitz on season six (warning, full article and my notes below contain spoilers for the season finale):

I’ll revisit this whole season again later this week and write an overview piece. For now this strikes me as Mad Men’s weakest season overall, often lacking the thematic, visual and rhythmic unity of seasons one through five – though there’s a chance that it’ll feel more complete and organized once I’ve had a chance to re-watch the entire thing. It might even seem to have a certain “drunk’s logic” to it, with the show flailing and lurching and stopping and starting like Don groping toward his epiphany.

I’m no critic, and nowhere near the TV intelligence of a master like Seitz, but I’d agree with his assessment. Thematic unity was something that when I think back to the earlier seasons was really prevalent: Don’s struggles in season one, the women characters being brought to the forefront in season two. Naturally when you get to know these characters after this much time, some jumping around in season six was expected. But not quite this much. And frankly, while the great acting helped a lot (reason number one this show remains clearly one of the best on televison) I didn’t buy Don’s ‘coming clean’ moment at all.

I still can’t wait to revisit those Peggy and Don scenes at a later date. Just phenomenal work. I have no idea where Matt Weiner will be taking us for the last season but I’m excited.

How to keep up to date on front-end technologies →

Pretty brilliant set of links and advice from Guille Paz, Her Mammana and Lean Linares.